Cutline · an open political typology

Find out how nearly you're someone else.

Every personality test tells you which box you're in. This one tells you how close you came to a different one — and shows you the arithmetic it used to decide.

Take it · 24 statements See the sixteen types

About four minutes · no account · nothing stored about you


The one your workplace paid for

MBTI is a trademark. Using it properly means licensing it, per seat, from a company that certifies practitioners — and at the end it hands you four letters and no working.

Sixteen-type tests
Four letters. Confident. No margin, no method, no licence to look inside.
Cutline
Four letters, the margin behind each one, and the whole instrument published free.

A type is only as firm as its weakest letter

Four axes — ownership, control, horizon, method. Twenty-four statements. The first two letters are an ordinary political compass quadrant; the second two cut each quadrant into four. That's the whole trick behind every sixteen-type system: two more axes, nothing mystical.

Then comes the part nobody else reports.

A real result
C·L·I·R
The Anarchist
Coin toss · 4 / 100
OwnershipC by 100
ControlL by 88
HorizonI by 100
MethodR by 4

Three cuts cleared comfortably. The fourth by four points out of a hundred. Change one answer and this person is a different type holding identical opinions — and no other test would have mentioned it.

ScoreBandWhat it means
0–9Coin tossOne answer from being a different type.
10–29A leanA tendency, not a conviction.
30–59SettledComfortably inside the box.
60–100EmphaticDeep in it. The box fits.

Which is how you end up saying something no other typology lets you say: "I'm a coin-toss anarchist."

Take it with people who'll argue

One map, everyone on it

Send a link. Family, colleagues, the group chat. Everyone lands on the same 2×2 with their scores. Nobody wins — that's the point of it.

Pick who reads it to you

Fifteen hosts, from The Professor to The Sixteen-Year-Old to an anarchist who declares his bias before he starts. One of them is narrated aloud.

It keeps your place

Stop halfway and come back. Past results are kept so you can watch yourself move — because you will, and that's more interesting than any single reading.

Free, and it stays free

The whole instrument is published: the four axes, all twenty-four statements with their exact weights, the scoring procedure, the sixteen type definitions. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 — fork it, translate it, run it commercially, build a better front end than this one. The single condition is share-alike, so it can't be closed again.

It would be a strange thing to argue that the left/right line flattens political reality, and then charge admission to the alternative.

For organisations

Three ways this gets paid for

The instrument is free to everyone, permanently. What's for sale is the work around it.

  • A commissioned instrument. Your axes, your statement bank, built and calibrated to the same standard and published under the same open licence. For unions, newsrooms, think tanks and campaigns who need to measure something specific and want to own the argument, not rent it.
  • White-label embeds. Cutline inside your masthead, your colours, your branding — plus an aggregate portrait of how your own readership actually splits. Counts only; never individuals.
  • The hosted API. Scoring as a service if you'd rather not implement the spec. Free tier, paid above it.
Start a conversation

So — how nearly are you someone else?

Twenty-four statements. Four minutes. No account, no email, nothing stored about you unless you ask for it.